This week the two chapters we read were about assessment and
instructional design. I’m fairly confident with the designs of my lessons and
instruction, however I am always looking for new ways to assess the students.
When teaching music or any other subject, it is important to be able to
appropriately assess the students’ progress. Many times it seems that teachers (including
myself!) feel that the only way to assess the students is to give them a test
on the subject. While some tests can be important, there are many other forms
of assessment that can be very useful, especially to music teachers who do not
always deal with written material.
One of the assessments that I use,
which is also described in Music Learning
Today is a checklist. When the students arrive to their lessons they are
supposed to have with them: a pencil, their method book, their instrument, and
their practice log. I award points for each item that they bring with them,
totaling 20 points per lesson. If the students do not have each item on the
list, I deduct points from their grade. Rubrics were also described as being
the “…most sophisticated of the three authentic assessment tools” (Bauer 2014).
Bauer uses an example of a world music presentation to demonstrate how a rubric
could be useful for assessment, but I have also used rubrics for playing tests.
Although admittedly I don’t have too many playing tests during the year, when I
do, I use a 1-5 rating scale for different components of the students’
performance. The categories are usually tone, tempo, dynamics, notes, and
rhythms, and the students will receive a 1-5 rating for each category. Just
like the example rubric in Figure 6.3 on page 139, I include a brief
description of each rating so the students will know why they received the
score that they got. I like this idea a lot because it eliminates the need to
ask “how did I get this grade?”. When there is evidence to back up the grade
the students’ received, it creates less issues from parents or students in the
future.
Chapter seven discussed instructional
design. In Prince George’s County MD where I teach, we follow Danielson’s
Framework for Teaching, which includes under domain 1 an element all about
designing coherent instruction. When administrators observe teachers, this is one
of the main aspects they look for in the teacher’s lesson plans. It was
interesting to read about all the different ways to begin designing and
implementing lessons. The “backwards” design was especially interesting because
it creates a desired outcome before creating activities and assessments to
achieve that outcome. As an instrumental teacher, I believe this is something I
do regularly for my lessons; I just didn’t realize I was doing it! The outcome
for my classes is the winter concert before winter break and the spring concert
before summer break. I already know I need to prepare the students for these
two programs, so after I determine the dates for these events, I begin to
determine which pieces to perform. After this is decided, I begin to plan lessons
geared toward performing the pieces I selected. This way, I have a goal to work
for and my lessons aren’t just random learning until a goal is decided later.
I also like the idea of project
based learning, or PBL that is discussed on page 150. People do not always
learn in the same way. Some people may thrive with quiet studying and
memorization, while others require much more hands on activities for
information to “stick”. Projects are ways that students of any age will be able
to remember what they have learned and apply it in a way that is more creative
than reciting facts. This is the way we have been learning about technology in
this graduate course, and it has really helped me understand how to use and
implement these new programs into my teaching. I try to include projects in my
classes, but do not use them as much as I would like. In the future, I hope to
add more projects about instruments, notes, rhythms, and musical terminology
into my lessons to help the students remember these things when the move to
middle and high school.
Amanda -
ReplyDeleteI've also enjoyed learning more about "backwards design." Like you, it's one of those things that I tend to do without realizing it. It is very validating as an educator to recognize and even label the good things you do naturally. Brava!
I appreciated reading about your checklist system. It makes sense and gives you a baseline for assessment each time you see your students. Rubrics, too, are such a helpful tool. I have used them quite a bit, but I think I need to do a better job of showing the rubrics to my students prior to assessment. Ideally, they should clearly know the expectations of an assignment so they can plan accordingly. I know I have appreciated the rubrics used throughout this graduate program. Knowing expectations can raise the bar. Thanks for your post!
Amanda! We are on the same wave length, nice post.
ReplyDelete